@article {1004,
	title = {EHRI: New Online Course on the Use of Primary Sources},
	volume = {85},
	year = {2018},
	month = {03/2018},
	pages = {8},
	keywords = {Holocaust, Online Course, Yad Vashem},
	url = {https://www.yadvashem.org/sites/default/files/85.pdf},
	author = {Dolinko, Dafne and Rosenfeld-Katz, Sandra}
}
@article {495,
	title = {Experiments for the design of a help desk system for the EHRI project - an Information Retrieval approach},
	journal = {DARIAH-DE Working Papers},
	volume = {5},
	year = {2014},
	url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2014-3-2 },
	author = {Rodriguez, Kepa J.}
}
@article {999,
	title = {EAD-ODD: A solution for project-specific EAD schemes},
	journal = {Archival Science},
	year = {2018},
	month = {2018},
	abstract = {<p>This article tackles the issue of integrating heterogeneous archival sources in one single data repository, namely the European Holocaust Research Infrastructure (EHRI) portal, whose aim is to support Holocaust research by providing online access to information about dispersed sources relating to the Holocaust (http://portal.ehri-project.eu). In this case, the problem at hand is to combine data coming from a network of archives in order to create an interoperable data space which can be used to search for, retrieve and disseminate content in the context of archival-based research. The scholarly purpose has specific consequences on our task. It assumes that the information made available to the researcher is as close as possible to the originating source in order to guarantee that the ensuing analysis can be deemed reliable. In the EHRI network of archives, as already observed in the case of the EU Cendari project, one cannot but face heterogeneity. The EHRI portal brings together descriptions from more than 1900 institutions. Each archive comes with a whole range of idiosyncrasies corresponding to the way it has been set up and evolved over time. Cataloging practices may also differ. Even the degree of digitization may range from the absence of a digital catalogue to the provision of a full-fledged online catalogue with all the necessary APIs for anyone to query and extract content. There is indeed a contrast here with the global endeavour at the international level to develop and promote standards for the description of archival content as a whole. Nonetheless, in a project like EHRI, standards should play a central role. They are necessary for many tasks related to the integration and exploitation of the aggregated content, namely: ● Being able to compare the content of the various sources, thus being able to develop quality-checking processes; ● Defining of an integrated repository infrastructure where the content of the various archival sources can be reliably hosted; ● Querying and re-using content in a seamless way; ● Deploying tools that have been developed independently of the specificities of the information sources, for instance in order to visualise or mine the resulting pool of information. The central aspect of the work described in this paper is the assessment of the role of the EAD (Encoded Archival Description) standard as the basis for achieving the tasks described above. We have worked out how we could develop a real strategy of defining specific customization of EAD that could be used at various stages of the process of integrating heterogeneous sources. While doing so, we have developed a methodology based on a specification and customization method inspired from the extensive experience of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) community. In the TEI framework, as we show in section 1, one has 1 https://team.inria.fr/almanach/ 2 Special thanks to Annelies van Nispen (NIOD) and Hector Martinez Alonso (ALMAnaCH) for their help.</p>
},
	keywords = {Archival Science, EAD, Holocaust, Standards},
	url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01737568},
	author = {Romary, Laurent and Riondet, Charles}
}
@proceedings {578,
	title = {The EHRI Project - Virtual Collections Revisited},
	volume = {8852},
	year = {2014},
	month = {2015},
	pages = {294-303},
	publisher = {Springer},
	address = {Barcelona},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-15168-7},
	url = {http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-15168-7/page/2},
	author = {Bryant, Mike and Reijnhoudt, Linda and Speck, Reto and Cl{\'e}rice, Thibault and Blanke, Tobias},
	editor = {Aieollo, Luca Maria and McFarland, Daniel}
}
@proceedings {310,
	title = {Comparison of named entity recognition tools for raw OCR text},
	year = {2012},
	month = {21September 2012},
	address = {Vienna },
	url = {http://www.oegai.at/konvens2012/proceedings/60_rodriquez12w/60_rodriquez12w.pdf},
	author = {Rodriguez, Kepa Joseba and Bryant, Mike and Blanke, Tobias and Luszczynska, Magdalena}
}
@conference {757,
	title = {Sustainable Digital Publishing of Archival Catalogues of Twentieth-Century History Archives},
	booktitle = {Open History: Sustainable digital publishing of archival catalogues of twentieth-century history archives, Brussels},
	year = {2016},
	month = {03/2016},
	address = {Brussels},
	abstract = {<p>One of the funded project proposals under DARIAH{\textquoteright}s Open Humanities call 2015 was {\textquotedblleft}Open History: Sustainable digital publishing of archival catalogues of twentieth-century history archives{\textquotedblright}. Based on the experiences of the Collaborative EuropeaN Digital Archival Research Infrastructure (CENDARI) and the European Holocaust Research Infrastructure (EHRI), the main goal of the {\textquotedblleft}Open History{\textquotedblright} project was to enhance the dialogue between (meta-)data providers and research infrastructures. Integrating archival descriptions {\textendash} when they were already available {\textendash} held at a wide variety of twentieth-century history archives (from classic archives to memorial sites, libraries and private archives) into research infrastructures has proven to be a major challenge, which could not be done without some degree of limited to extensive pre-processing or other preparatory work. The {\textquotedblleft}Open History{\textquotedblright} project organized two workshops and developed two tools: an easily accessible and general article on why the practice of standardization and sharing is important and how this can be achieved; and a model which provides checklists for self-analyses of archival institutions. The text that follows is the article we have developed. It intentionally remains at a general level, without much jargon, so that it can be easily read by those who are non-archivists or non-IT. Hence, we hope it will be easy to understand for both those who are describing the sources at various archives (with or without IT or archival sciences degrees), as well as decision-makers (directors and advisory boards) who wish to understand the benefits of investing in standardization and sharing of data. It is important to note is that this text is a first step, not a static, final result. Not all aspects about standardization and publication of (meta-)data are discussed, nor are updates or feedback mechanisms for annotations and comments discussed. The idea is that this text can be used in full or in part and that it will include further chapters and section updates as time goes by and as other communities begin using it. Some archives will read through much of these and see confirmation of what they have already been implementing; others {\textendash} especially the smaller institutions, such as private memory institutions {\textendash} will find this a low-key and hands-on introduction to help them in their efforts.</p>
},
	url = {https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01281442},
	author = {Vanden Daelen, Veerle and Edmond, Jennifer and Links, Petra and Priddy, Mike and Tollar, Vaclav and Van Nispen, Annelies}
}
@conference {366,
	title = {European Holocaust Research Infrastructure},
	booktitle = {Tagung Europ{\"a}ische Forschungsinfrastrukturen in den Geisteswissenschaften},
	year = {2012},
	month = {21-22 Feb 2012},
	publisher = {CLARIN-AT and DARIAH-AT},
	organization = {CLARIN-AT and DARIAH-AT},
	address = {{\"O}sterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien},
	author = {Schellenbacher, Wolfgang and Rasky, Bela}
}
@inbook {360,
	title = {The Past and the Future of Holocaust Research: From Disparate Sources to an Integrated European Holocaust Research Infrastructure},
	booktitle = {Evolution der Informationsinfrastruktur: Forschung und Entwicklung als Kooperation von Bibliothek und Fachwissenschaft},
	year = {2013},
	pages = {157-77},
	publisher = {Verlag Werner H{\"u}lsbusch},
	organization = {Verlag Werner H{\"u}lsbusch},
	address = {Gl{\"u}ckstadt},
	doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3249/webdoc-39006},
	url = {https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1405/1405.2407.pdf},
	author = {Blanke, Tobias and Vanden Daelen, Veerle and Frankl, Michal and Kristel, Conny and Rodriguez, Kepa J. and Speck, Reto},
	editor = {Rapp, Andrea and Lossau, Norbert and Neuroth, Heike}
}
