@article {1004,
	title = {EHRI: New Online Course on the Use of Primary Sources},
	volume = {85},
	year = {2018},
	month = {03/2018},
	pages = {8},
	keywords = {Holocaust, Online Course, Yad Vashem},
	url = {https://www.yadvashem.org/sites/default/files/85.pdf},
	author = {Dolinko, Dafne and Rosenfeld-Katz, Sandra}
}
@article {838,
	title = {EHRI Furthers Educational and Research Opportunities},
	volume = {81},
	year = {2016},
	month = {October 2016},
	pages = {23},
	edition = {October 2016},
	keywords = {EHRI},
	issn = {0793-7199},
	url = {http://www.yadvashem.org/sites/default/files/yv-magazine81.pdf},
	author = {Petra Drenth and Hillel Solomon}
}
@article {758,
	title = {Who holds the key to Holocaust-related sources? Authorship as subjectivity in finding aids},
	journal = {Holocaust Studies},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {1-23},
	abstract = {<p>The field of Holocaust studies relies on a wide variety of archives, dispersed all over the world. Identifying the right sources for a specific research question within this field is not easy or straightforward. Yet Holocaust scholars predominately focus on methodologies for source analysis rather than discovery. Archival finding aids are among the most important tools to aid primary source discovery, but have hitherto not been considered in methodological discussions on Holocaust research. In this article we will reflect on the composition of finding aids based on our work for the European Holocaust Research Infrastructure (EHRI). Our premise is that the content of finding aids is determined by their authors and the context in which they are creating them. The strongest argument for this subjectivity is that our work {\textendash} outlined in this article {\textendash} not only indicates that descriptions of one and the same source differ, but that they can do so quite considerably, and hence can influence research. Our stance is that historians optimize their profit from finding aids by becoming more sensitive to the subjectivity and authorship of descriptions. We conclude by showing how an online environment such as the one developed by EHRI can sensitize historians and archivists to the situated and subjective nature of finding aids by accommodating a plurality of descriptive voices, and encourage them to share their knowledge and become co-authors of finding aids.</p>
},
	doi = {10.1080/17504902.2015.1118193},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17504902.2015.1118193},
	author = {Petra Links and Reto Speck and Veerle Vanden Daelen}
}
@article {448,
	title = {An Approach to Analyzing Working Practices of Research Communities in the Humanities},
	journal = {International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2013},
	chapter = {105-27},
	abstract = {The need for a firm understanding of the working practices of researchers in the humanities emerges as a prerequisite for the development of effective digital research infrastructures. This paper will focus on the rationale behind the design and implementation of two related studies conducted in the context of two European e-Infrastructures projects, DARIAH and EHRI. Within DARIAH the challenge involved conducting, analysing and understanding research practices of arts and humanities researchers, a largely ill-defined community encompassing a wide spectrum of disciplines. Each of them deals with a variety of objects employing an extensive number of methods. In the context of EHRI, the challenge is slightly different, due to the involvement of a better-defined research community. Holocaust researchers share well-identified objects, common ground on methods, and handle similar setbacks. In this paper we discuss the approach adopted for designing and implementing qualitative user-centric studies aimed at capturing activities, methods, and types of information objects employed by researchers grounded in identified research goals and questions. It addresses both generic and specific entities and processes, and supports the understanding of researchers{\textquoteright} working practices in settings as diverse and wide as DARIAH, or as specialized as EHRI. The outcomes of the analysis of working practices are used in determining user requirements for digital infrastructures to serve the respective research communities.},
	url = {http://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/ijhac.2013.0084},
	author = {Benardou, Agiatis and Constantopoulos, Panos and Dallas, Costis}
}
@proceedings {361,
	title = {Defining User Requirements for Holocaust Research Infrastructures and Services in the EHRI Project},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {644-45},
	address = {Toronto, Canada},
	author = {Benardou, Agiatis and Dallas, Costis}
}
@conference {1118,
	title = {Digital Methods in Holocaust Studies: The European Holocaust Research Infrastructure},
	booktitle = {2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science)},
	year = {2018},
	month = {12/2018},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	organization = {IEEE},
	address = {Amsterdam, The Netherlands},
	keywords = {Digital Humanities, Digital Methods, Holocaust},
	url = {https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8588640},
	author = {Daan de Leeuw and Bryant, Mike and Frankl, Michal and Nikolova, Ivelina and Alexiev, Vladimir}
}
@conference {364,
	title = {Classical Philology, Text-based and Holocaust Studies Facing Digital Research Infrastructures: From Practice to Requirements},
	booktitle = {SDH 2011: Supporting Digital Humanities},
	year = {2011},
	month = {17-18 Nov 2011},
	address = {Universtiy of Copenhagen},
	author = {Dallas, Costis}
}
